Related Video Collections
All Comments
Why do women dislike domination so much? I can understand women being upset at being asked to perform domination as it might imply that they are not pretty or that they are not feminine.
But apart from that women seem to hate the idea as they think it is against nature or some such rubbish idea that seems to float around in the female mind about sex. | I dislike domination quite a lot and i'm a guy.
I feel it promotes aggressiveness in a relationship. | Why do women want men to be feminine? like they unanimously want men to be lil to none hairy on their bodies....esp. their torsos.
They force men to look like flat chested female....why?Female domination?
Why can't they accept men to be men? | | I would, in no way, want a feminine man. I do like body hair, just not on the back... | For feminine women, did your first aggressive interplay with a woman create a fascination with seduction? I asked this question earlier today and used the word "domination". This led to much confusion by responders. I hope people will be less confused at this time. | you're beautiful! (sigh, why aren't you in Chile?)
anyways, I am a feminine woman, and i'm also very submissive. I love to be seduced, never really been the seductress. I love the idea of someone pulling out all the stops and making me feel like a real woman, you know?
I would say its a fascination, but I have certainly fantasized a time or two about it ;) | Why have feminists pulled the white flag and supported conservative ideas of supression of female sexuality? Women wearing jackets and cutting their hair and saying they are "strong"... Womens sexuality and sexual objectification is a strength for women, it is not degrading. I think women are represented by so-called fake "feminists" who are really in favor of the male-dominated society by dressing like a male with jackets and cutting their hair to look "independent and strong". now that, is acknowledging male identity as the represantative of these values. so where is "feminine" in that? where is female freedom from male-dominated society in that? how is this something any different than acknowledging masculine identity as the symbol of domination and power? | | Not necessarily masculine but also known as presenting oneself in a professional manner. This has nothing to do with sexuality and more with how you perceive sexuality. | Why do women think they need to be like men? in order to be equal.Can the feminine quality be the only way to save the planet from masculine domination and destructiveness.Why do women join the fighting forces..what are they trying to prove? | | you mean like billy jean king. my guess, men didnt stand up for her. cradle her, feel her pain,sweet talk her, but they would support other causes for her. its sad. all our fault | Is machismo a product of an oppressive society? If so, do you think that "machos" are just a product of Third World Countries"?
"I am a recovering macho, a product of an oppressive society, a society where gender, race and class domination do not exist in isolated compartments, nor are they neatly relegated to uniform categories of repression. They are created in the space where they interact and conflict with each other, a space I will call machismo. The understanding of machismo requires a full consideration of sexism, heterosexism, racism, ethnocentrism and classism. All forms of oppression are identical in their attempt to domesticate the Other. The sexist, who sees women playing a lesser productive role than men, transfers upon the non-elite male Other effeminate characteristics, placing him in a feminine space for "easy mounting."
Excerpt from "Beyond Machismo: A Cuban Case Study
Dr. Miguel De La Torre, (formerly of) Hope College
Whole paper at:
www.libertadlatina.org/Latin_Amer… | Yes, all forms of domination and all hierarchies are inherently oppressive. The existence of domination and hierarchies itself means, by definition, that a society is oppressive, at least to some or most of it's people.
Power hierarchies work by creating believed differences in the perceived value of individuals using physical, spiritual, economic, or emotional differences to divide people. Machiavelli articulated this well. Power exists and perpetuates itself by creating conflict among its dominions. It does not matter if the masses hate the ruling class, so long as the masses do not love each other.
This is why (in our culture) those who are wealthy, white, male, protestants are treated preferentially. By giving more power to those who are similar to the ruling class it reinforces and legitimizes the power of the ruling class. Makes it appear normal, part of the "natural order" of things.
This does not mean that all males are treated better or valued more than all females. Likewise for the other differentiating factors. It simply means that the more closely you emulate the ruling class, the more you are seen as powerful and valuable.
To divide a society of subjects along racial, religious, or economic lines is simply inadequate if you wish to have real control over the masses. The races, people of different faiths, and people of different economic classes can do quite well avoiding each other. The sexes, on the other hand, must live together. If you really want to divide and conquer, you place a wedge between man and woman. You create enmity between them, get them to struggle over the crumbs of power. This means that the family unit is riddled with strife, distrust, trauma, and energy-sapping conflict. Not even the family unit achieves solidarity in this setting. All the better to rule you by.
Lastly, the domination can't be complete without dividing the self from the self. By creating schisms within the psyche of individuals you can completely paralyze them politically. When they come to believe "this part of who I am is bad, and this part is good" then they will spend their energy trying to push down the parts of themselves they have come to see as unacceptable while trying to showcase those parts that are considered acceptable. This means that not even the individual is allowed wholeness.
Divide and conquer.
Divide and conquer.
Love is a subversive act. | Is it possible that a physically/mentally abused guy can grow up with homosexual tendencies? I was raised in a heavily abusive home. I do not consider myself gay or bi, but I do have homosexual tendencies that I believe arose from CONSTANT domination from my stepfather. I was never allowed to do anything without being told to. I was made to work constantly, and a variety of other abuse. I lived through this from the age of 3. My therapist and I are exploring this route as to why I am having homosexual thoughts and feelings. I am not attracted to men, nor am I interested in any romantic/emotional relationships with men. However, I sometimes think about men having sex with me. I also feel compulsed to dress in women's clothing . I think this is to provide something feminine to the homoerotic masturbation I engage in from time to time, or as a way to transform myself into "someone else". I am married, and my wife knows about this. What do you think? Am I trying to somehow relive the constant domination? Please see the following link: www.joekort.com/articles84.h... | You are identifying with your mother and not wanting to be just like the unfortunate and pathetic step father. Know that all men are not like him. Keep up the good work in therapy. This is why women that are in violent situations should leave the situation that confuse their guyren who are exposed to it. (boys generally tend to believe this is the way men should treat women/girls think this is what real love is)
I would suggest that you go to therapy and stay in therapy. Most people who were domestic violence/guy abuse victims need therapy to get over years of intimidation and violence. It is too bad that you recieved no justice in a court against him personally. | Foot fetish for ladies feet but don't want my partner to lose respect? I love icking feminine lady's feet.
And I would love to "worship" my partner's beautiful feet and clean them with my tongue, but I'm afraid to get into a habit of doing it because I feel this might cause her to lose respect for me. (I don't want a female domination relationship or her to become bossy or controlling). | | You can't have it all bud | Please advise on my foot fetish? I love licking feminine lady's feet. And I would love to "worship" my partner's beautiful feet and clean them with my tongue, BUT I'm afraid to get into a habit of doing it because I feel this might cause her to lose respect for me. (I don't want a female domination relationship or her to become bossy or controlling). | | uh, gee, have you ever thought about just saying to her: "not every guy with a foot fetish is submissive, and I'm the type who isn't"? It.... doesn't seem that hard. "Hey, I want to lick your feet, but I don't want to be called a pathetic worm while I'm doing it." See? Pretty easy, really. |
|